For any company that has put "customer service" on a pedestal as a core component of their offering...and meant it, the recent study conducted by American Express had to have been a great comfort.
For any company that has put "customer service" on a pedestal as a core component of their offering...and meant it, the recent study conducted by American Express had to have been a great comfort.
For those who missed it, AmEx released something called "The American Express Global Customer Service Barometer"yesterday and, among other things, it revealed that consumers in the United States were willing to pay a 9-percent premium for what they considered "excellent service." In some countries, the premium crept up to 11-percent.
The study contained a number of additional interesting nuggets, particularly about the negative effects of a poor customer experience and how likely a single negative experience was to drive customer defection, but the headline was clearly the tangible, measurable return on "excellent service." For those who have long considered "service" to be a pillar of their offering but have struggled to put a number on it, this is a soothing headline. For those who have long wished to make "service" a priority but have been thwarted by those demanding a hard and fast return, this was a strong future argument. And this is even before you begin calculating in the lifetime value of that customer, the cost of acquiring new customers in the instance of customer defection, etc.
The study provides some reassurance that a.) service is important and b.) service is a worthwhile investment, but also leaves open the question of....what exactly is "excellent" service. And the answer to that, of course, differs by industry, company, brand, target market, etc. Defining how YOU deliver excellence is the art in customer experience delivery, and there is no "one-size-fits-all" way of getting there.
There are a few questions you can ask yourself, however.
Reader Comments:
|
A great rating system
Actually, this system has been in use in Los Angeles for at least a dozen years and it works great! It is based on the cleanliness of an establishment and as a consumer I have a right to know this before I sit down to eat. In LA the public knows what the different levels mean and most of use would be perfectly comfortable with an A or B rating. Anything less than that should probably be avoided no matter how good the food tastes! A little public education goes a long way with this system. Quite frankly, if a restaurant isn't shooting for an A in cleanliness everyday then why are they in the food service business in the first place?! 2010-08-12 Bob Hennessey |
|
|
|